About Me

Name: You can see...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

What's wrong with the Media?

Hugh Hewitt's interview with Mark Steyn yesterday hit on one of my pet peeves, the cookie-cutter sameness of journalists today:

HH: . . . But does the guild...I interview Peter Baker next hour, Washington Post White House correspondent. And I challenge him at the end of that, I recorded it already, that the guild has taken over, and the guild never self-criticizes, and as a result, I don't think they've got any fresh air in journalism.

MS: No, I think it's a very closed...it's an unusually closed world, compared with media groups and media cultures in other countries. I think that's what I find so shocking about it. I mean, I don't think journalism is a profession. A young lady, a neighbor in my town in New Hampshire, she wanted some career advice. She wanted to go and do a master's degree at, I think it was Columbia Journalism School, or maybe at Berekeley, because she wanted to be an editor of the Atlantic Monthly. And her parents were going to literally mortgage the farm and bankrupt themselves to do this for her. And I said well, what...I said you don't need a master's degree to edit me. I said I'm a columnist at the Atlantic Monthly, and I haven't got any fancy degree in journalism. It's not a profession. And professionalizing it has in America made it essentially this sort of effete, desiccated, upper-middle class, closed profession, that I think has done readers a terrible disservice.

I blame the rise of Journalism Schools.  College degrees are fine, but none of them should given for journalism.  The problem is that all of our journalists have come out depersonalized.  They write the same, have the same views, have the same associates and generally have been taught that they are some some or Constitutional institution with more authority than the government.  The "people's right to know" has become an excuse to violate the law.  Their arrogance, even toward their own customers, has become pathological. 

The solution is to do away with J-schools and hire people from other majors and let them learn on the job.  The good writers will rise to the top.  Then insist that your reporters follow the Joe Friday Rule: just the facts.  Too many American reporters write as if they were really after a Pulitzer than after telling the public the news.  Many of their stories read like assignments in a fiction writing class.  You get the feeling that they all really want to be novelists, rather than mere reporters. 

We have too many specialty departments in colleges today, anyway.  They should focus on giving kids general knowledge and the tools to dig into the specifics they want to know about.   Having a J-school degree doesn't make you a journalist any more than a degree in religious studies makes you holy. 

I decided long ago that a college education is vastly overrated.  What counts more is how good you are at networking. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Partly Cloudy?

Check out this map of the area around Beirut showing the areas being attacked by Israeli bombers.  This is hardly Dresden.  If these areas were clouds on a weather radar image, the general weather would probably called sunny.

It's indeed a terrible thing to be inside an area being bombed, but the way to stop all this would seem to be very simple.  Hezbollah should disarm and cease firing rockets into Israel.  Israel has a right to defend itself and would be overjoyed to have peace with its neighbors. 
So when I hear people whining about the cruelty of these attacks, I have to think what's keeping this going?  And since it is within the discretion of Hamas and Hezbollah, Syria and Iran to drop these attempts to destroy Israel, and thereby put a stop to all Israelis military reactions, why aren't they being blamed?

If you walk up to a grizzly bear and start hitting it with a stick or shooting at it, whom should people blame for your injuries?  Or, who is at fault when a person remains out on a golf course during a thunderstorm and gets hit by lightening? 

As I just heard on Michael Medved's radio show, "If Hamas and Hezbollah put down their guns, there would be peace.  If Israel put down its guns, there would be no more Israel."  It's that simple.  The fact that so many people continue to blame this all on Israel imdicates to me that they are either incapable of clear thought or dishonest.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Mind of Matthews

Just heard a clip of Chris Matthews being interviewed on the Don Imus show.  He was in full incoherent moonbat mode, and it was shocking to hear from such a prominent media pundit.   The transcript is being typed and will be posted at Radio Blogger.   Read it and watch your jaw drop.

Dealing with the left these days is like trying to kill a hydra.  You cut off one stupid claim and argument and six more take their place.   This is why I quit watching his show.   As far as I'm conerned these people have forgotten that they are reporters not lecturers or preachers. 

Update:  This was a classic case of a Bush Derangement Syndrome meltdown.  The sufferer becomes incoherent and disjointed, stating conclusions and alleged "facts" that are nothing but left wing assertions repeated to the point where they've become common "knowledge" among the Anti-Bush Anti-War crowd.  I've seen them before.  It's astonishing to see someone you thought was intelligent and normal launch into a monologue that sounds psychotic.  

This kind can come forth by nothing, but by prayer and fasting. 

Mostly, I find the best think to do is avert one's gaze.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kerry plays relevant.

The Pope offers sex therapy   Actually, it's Senator John Kerry who thinks his experience in pontificating about foreign policy gives him some credibility.  Since his latest postition is that we should crawl penitently to the U.N. and seek its pardon for overthrowing their Sugar Daddy, Saddam, forgive me if I tend to chortle at his continuing denunciations of George W. Bush.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No new deals, please.

The West must  have "STUPID" tattooed on its forehead, if it goes for new cease fires with Hamas and Hezbollah.  We should refuse to talk to either group and speak only with their sponsors, Syria and Iran. 

What we're talking about now reminds me of the appeasement prior to WWII, during which Hitler continued to rearm  Germany.  I don't want to see more young men and women die any more than anybody else does, but to me, it's either fight them now or lose more lives later because we trusted them to bargain in good faith.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Just War

We Americans seem to have adopted the view that we are the only ones entitled to conduct just wars, that they must be kept short and sanitary. 

We've never been attacked by rocket with warheads full of buckshot in order to tear apart human flesh.  We've been attacked by people who would gladly murder every last American and we're fighting them.  How can we credibly ask the Israelis to do different. 

I'm a believer that "limited" wars are just a slow way to lose.  In most wars, there's some person or party at the root who keeps it going.  It might be to create an empire, to spread an ideology, or just to gain power.  The war will not end until the source of the evil is eliminated. 

Like a boil, there is a core to the abscess, and it can't begin to heal until that core is removed and the infection can drain.  That should be our approach.  Identify the source of the infection and eliminate it.   If we had taken this approach in North Koreak, how many fewer people would have died?  How about Saddam's victims in Iraq?  How about our unwillingness to take the Vietnam war to the North during the Johnson era? 

The Arabs are like the South in the Civil War.  Until the horrors of war were brought home to their heartland, they thought of the war as a noble cause being fought for their rights as states and slave owners.  Until that view is seen to be the route to great suffering,  there can be no peace.  Such is the case with those who still think they can eleminate the state of Israel.  It is a fact of life, and the sooner the nations of the region come to terms with that, the happier they and everyone else will be.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hugh needs ratings

Instead of thos Crosley boxes he's been selling, as great as they might be, I think one of these radios would add to his audience's listening pleasure.  BTW, the comments are priceless: "These go to 11!"
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In Praise of Mark Helprin

I've heard of Mark Helprin before, and read some of  his writing, but I didn't know how much to value his opinions until I heard him on <a HREF="http://www.hughhewitt.townhall.com">Hugh Hewitt's</a> show.  From his bio and website, he seems to be a golden boy, with literary and academic credentials one would expect from a Harvard don, but a life history more along the lines of Austin Bay.  What impresses me most about him is his lack of an obvious ax to grind and his careful  observation and method of drawing conclusions. 

We're all in danger of lapsing into the "Well, I've see this before and the usual explanations apply."  But I don't see that in the commentators I respect the most, like Helprin, Byron York, etc.

Not that I don't love Mark Steyn, Christopher Hitchens, James Lileks and the rest, because when I listen to them, because I listen for their insights, logic and flair as well as references to stuff I'll never in my life read or know about otherwise.  I'm in the position of one with poor short term memory and life long ADD.  That doesn't mean I don't read; just that I can't read and comprehend whatever I set my mind to.  If it's not interesting or if I'm not in the right mood, I just move my eyes over it and nothing gets through the fog.  This is said to have something to do with inner ear problems, which seem to be as well understood as the origin of the Big Bang. 

Anyway, I have come to respect Mr. Helprin's comments in a way that goes beyond those with whom I just agree.  If I found myself disagreeing with him, I'd feel that I needed to reexamine everything I knew about the matter.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A New TV Genre

I don't know what to call it, but It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia reminds me of all the Owen Wilson movies I've seen ads for about 30-something slackers and the hideous fixes they get themselves into.  I shouldn't watch stuff like this, but it's so funny you'd better not be drinking anything except during the commercials.  Every episode involves a family, headed by Danny Devito, who run a bar in Philly, who get into something in each episode not just really stupid, drunk, illegal and totally irresponsible ending in things worse than you would have guessed. . 

I can hear Hugh Hewitt's horselaugh talking about the show with Emmet, the Unblinking.  It has to bring back memories of his misspent youth, or like me, the kind of losers he's been around.  I was never in a frat, so I had to learn about how stupid people can be by representing them as a public defender.  Like the guys who got drunk and borrowed the car from one's girlfriend and drove out through the desert knocking down every roadsign they came to.  These signs were mounted on 4x4 wooden posts, so you can imagine what they did to the car and each one was another count of damaging federal property. 

These stories can't be made up except by some seriously creative and experienced people.  They're on FX and sort of like My Name is Earl except they're rated MA/LV which means they're raunchier and feel more dangerous. 

One episode is 100 Dollar Baby, which tells you a lot.   It's about boxing, street fighting, beer, steroids and meth-head muggers.  The language lends verisimilitude.

Another deals with a scheme to allow underage patrons into their bar and the problems that ensue. 

They are milk-out-of-your-nose funny.   They must have a name for the type--such as Moron Modern Sitcom.  I'm sure, however, that Jeff Goldstein would have the bon mot.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Shiites Hit the Fan

Israel has been attacked repeatedly by the terrorist groups in control of Gaza and now from Lebanon, and has responded with muscle.

Hizbollah and Hamas are tag-teaming Israel in the guise of being poltical groups.  Why this works, I don't know.  To me, they are intenational criminal organizations and should be targeted wherever they appear.  It's obviously dirty pool to attack people with acts of war and then hide behind civilians and call your victims terrorists when they defend themselves.  But does the U.N. get it?  Not so's you'd notice.   Is everybody nuts? 

The left is crying that Israel is hitting civilians, but they seem to think that Israelis don't have any of those or they'd have condemned these terrorist groups long ago. 

Is it just their reflexive support for whoever looks like an underdog?  You could take 100 Israelis at random and 100 Palestinians, and put them in an arena without weapons,  and the Israelis would be building a community, schools and businesses before the Arabs had figured out where they were.  Then they'd spot the Jews and declare war, and when they got their noses bloodied they run to the audience and cry bullies!

These people are the natural result of self-pity and the pity industry upon which most NGOs and international terrorism is based. Until they see what's going on and shake off their programming, we can't help them.

Update: After listening a second time to Christopher Hitchens' comments on Hugh's program, I feel confirmed in my assessment above.   Hitchens views Israel as an occupation not a state and  faults it for ruling over people who did not consent to its doing so.  The problem is that they have tried to give them a government of their own, and they have run back to the arms of their captors.  The will of the Palestinian people is a mythi.  It's not a safe society in which to have a will of one's own.  If you do, you might give it voice, and then you'd be one of those corpses strung up by the roving mobs of "militia."  

All I can do from my perch is ask myself, if I were a Palestinian back in the 1940s, what would I have seen as best for my family.  I wouldn't welcome the return of the Jews, especially if it would cost me my land, but one thing I think I would  have learned living in that area is that when the elephants dance, the mice should lay low.  If I could see that Israel was coming,  whether I or my people liked it or not.   I might have gone to arms, but sooner or later, I think I would have realized that I didn't want to make warfare my life's work, especially when I could see farms and homes and cities being built where my own folk had done nothing for the past 1,000 years or so.  I would, I hope, have realized that my children in Israel could get educations, jobs and have law and order, while in my own people I would be another ward of the charity of the U.N. et al.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »